Executive SearchEmployee Services
CnetG - Passion in People
For Employers
Register with us and you'll have access to a wide range of candidates.
Job Seekers
Post your profile & CV or receive mails with the latest jobs that match what you're looking for.



Who We Are

Effectiveness of a Performance Management System
Speaker: Mr. K. Raj Kumar - CnetG Asia Sdn Bhd

The following is an excerpt of a speech delivered by the writer at the National Conference on HR Best Practices 2001 in May this year at the Crown Princess Hotel, Kuala Lumpur.

Whilst employers have a tough time attracting, retaining and motivating employees, especially during tight labor markets, the performance management system, the most important of the "people management tool" is either lacking in many an organization or if they have one, it is not effectively administered.

FAIRNESS AND SUBJECTIVITY
- one of the vital issues to be considered in an effective performance management system is fairness and subjectivity. In this regard, measurable performance objectives and standards shall be pre-agreed. Besides this, the performance objectives should be linked to the company's business plan and ideally concluded prior to the annual budget time. Knowledge ability in the business of the company also contributes to the successful realization of the issue in case. Once these factors are considered, attaining the commitment and loyalty of the employee is crucial.

INVOLVEMENT
- involvement of the employees determines the effectiveness of the Performance Management System. The standards shall be mutually developed and realistic. The SMART strategy is recommended here. The Multiple Rater System (MRS) could also be used to narrow down potential disparities in rating by different heads within a company, despite using the same system. The MRS, when implemented, will probably be a forerunner to the presently popular 360º feedback.

REINFORCEMENT
- reinforcing the system is also crucial. Ken Blanchard - "catch 'em doing right" is appropriate in this situation. Such practice will provide greater encouragement and builds confidence in the employees in the short and long term.

DEVELOPMENT
- during the development of the system, desire key outcomes shall be considered. Weaknesses and new skills or knowledge are exposed due to failure in incomplete development. Absence of a back-up system or a follow-up approach further adds to the potential failure of the Performance Management System. The development stage should also consider counseling, coaching and mentoring skills to facilitate the achievement of the targets. Adopting such practice leads to Kaizen, i.e. Continuous Development, and subsequently turns the workplace into a Learning Organization.

CARING AND SHARING
- the other nagging issue is the lackadaisical attitude among employees, wherein nobody cares for the maintenance of the system while in implementation. The raison d'etre of the system is fast forgotten and the system begins to loose its virtues when employees go back to their day-to-day activities doing tasks to the best of their knowledge instead of developing the "gung ho" attitude.

HOW AM IN DOING?
Employees who are committed to self-development need to know their level of performance. Constant feedback would certainly provide continuous improvement and will prevent the static mindset and tunnel vision, which prevail in some situations. Critical in this respect is, whether the means or the ends-obviously both.

FEEDBACK
- in the Performance Management System, feedback is an intrinsic feature, which however objectively it is rendered, poses the concern as to how many employees are comfortable with it. Is there an honest relationship with/ among parties involved? How many are comfortable with the feedback?

DOCUMENTATION
- All that transpired in the Performance appraisal needs to be documented.Remember Edward Deming? - facts not fear. It should cover the facts and it should be simple.

FOCUSED TO THE COMPANY CULTURE AND PHILOSOPHY
- is the system geared towards these? It is the experience of the speaker that there are still many MNCs that used the performance development system developed by their organization headquarters abroad. Local companies, typically emulate the system of another company, in the "copy and paste" style. It should be best fit with the whole paradigm, with a rating scale if appropriate.

PRODUCTIVITY
- many organizations, especially those that are monopolistic, make profit but their productivity may be suffering - effectiveness suffers due to complacency or a weak objective system, hence effectiveness suffers.

VALUE-FOCUSED
- Any system must add value to the organization in terms of the ROI, time and resources spent and other Key Performance Indicators.

TIMING
- Ideally performance appraisal must be done before budget time. This is so that, newly set goals that incur cost can be budgeted for, for the next fiscal year.

TRAINING OF APPRAISER AND APPRAISEES
- to also mitigate supervisory resignations. The succeeding supervisor should be adequately trained before becoming part of the system. Usually, only supervisors are trained to solve problems but not the employees. Since problem solving is part of the system, employees too ought to be trained in this issue.

EXTERNAL EVALUATION
- the entire PMS and the appraisals need to be audited by an external consultant or somebody from a sister company. This can augmented by climate study and opinion surveys, which add value to the system.

CONSTANCY OF PURPOSE
- employees in the same grade level must be appraised around the same time period as to avoid disparity due to unpredictable business conditions and the varying temperament of the supervisor. The criteria used for the measurement can be more universally applied, if done this way.

PROACTIVE HR DEPARTMENT
- As The HR Department has the ultimate responsibility of the system including access to individual records, the officer in charge needs to be more vigilant and aggressive to correct any disparities and inconsistent assessment.

TOP MANAGEMENT
- the discipline starts at the top. The top management should not only be committed but also ensure consistency in the application of the system. The two extremes of people management are that of HIRING and FIRING. Modern management science has yet to find a 100% foolproof method of hiring and neither firing, especially when "smart" lawyers are still allowed into the local industrial courts. Performance Management, if effectively managed and conducted can contribute tremendously to not only minimize these problems of extremes but also help enhance the people and organization performance. Remember turning the organization into one of high-performance is the ultimate goal!

Top